Descripción general de precios de BRYTER

Allows users, with minimal training required, to quickly build functioning prototype tools. Time to MVP is great. Empowers subject matter experts to build their own tools. More advanced features allow for much more powerful applications to be built. Visual editor means stucture of tools is clear. Debugging and testing features are improving.

The document automation capabilities are limited - doesn't have anywhere near the sophistication of other dedicated document automation tools. Look and feel of the tools could be more flexible. Absence of any data visualisation capability.

Initially, embedding high level legal knowledge into non-chargeable client-facing tools, to generate leads and market intelligence. Increasingly looking at paid-for tools in more narrow areas of legal knowledge

BRYTER is a flexible automation platform for which we have found a proliferation of use cases. We love working with the BRYTER team, who are consistently helpful, responsive and creative. Any feedback we have is quickly taken into account and it seems that new features and innovations are released weekly, making it an exciting platform to build within.

Honestly, we have had only good experiences working with BRYTER.

We are freeing up internal bottlenecks and automating arduous, time-consuming manual processes with BRYTER. The solution has enabled us to actually automate legal workflows and both lawyers and clients have been excited about this.

What do I like best? The ease of use and the control you have to change and improve the tools you build. The easy-to-learn and understand interface lets you build a tool with "visual code" in no time. You can add the features and details you want, not just what a finished app/tool provider decided to include on their side. You can go back in whenever you want to make adjustments and improvements on your own.

What could be better? The ability to connect or interface with other systems is more limited than I would like. I know the BRYTER team is adding functionality and options tocommunicate with different programs and platforms, but this is the most limiting factor I see with BRYTER. If a task or job requires an entry into another system or a connection to another program that BRYTER cannot handle, the value BRYTER could bring is reduced, since using a BRYTER tool would still require a manual step or another tool to fill the gap between the systems.

I have been using BRYTER to develop tools that can generate first drafts of agreements, and other template-based documents, more quickly and efficiently than using word-based templates or PDF forms. You can create a tool that can customize a draft based on user inputs and still produce a clean and well-formatted product with a few mouse clicks.

The UI is beautiful and intuitive and is the best solution for no-coders.

I'd like a solution for individual lawyers in addition to enterprise pricing.

I've been able to create an automatic contract generation app, thanks to Bryter and it is helping people in India generate free contracts without the help of a lawyer.

Bryter will let you assemble a business logic and turn it into a web app. It is very easy to learn, a pleasure graphics-wise, and offers more depth than you'd think. A few simple node types and actions can multiply into a complex module and route user input straight into a database, or output a simple email or document. You'll be able to build big modules in a fraction of the time it would take to properly program a website or app - and brand them properly.

Recursive actions and validations are hard to build. Internal data validation is rather basic; for example, if a user enters an address, it cannot be verified against, say, GoogleMaps. Looping back up a logic tree is impossible, as is building multiple choice lists with opt-out (e.g. this - that - none of the above). While building big modules is fast and satisfying, the pricing model will discourage from building nifty smaller modules. While it offers good document completion capabilities, would not recommend it for full-fledged document automation tasks.

Taking clients through complex business logic trees to offer solutions and advice in generated documents.

Bryter is an incredibly flexible platform which integrates multiple different tools for end to end automation. Whether you need to integrate emails, templates, documents, downloads or build databases and reports, it is all possible. As a tech-y who works with non-techies, it is refreshing to use a tool which all of my colleagues immediately understand the value of and are able to get straight to using. Finally, the bryter team are amazing. Responsive, thoughtful and supportive. I can't remember the last time I had such good customer service from a tech company.

We are waiting for a Hubspot integration which needs to be added to the roadmap, however this isn't really a blocker to our functionality.

We have streamlined the workflow, enabling our management team to reduce the amount of time it takes to supervise our trainee legal adviers. MT no longer has to switch between apps or programmes and we aren't losing people in the process due to poor admin or user error.

BRYTER is an excellent instrument for organizations that are in need - and might not realize to be in need! - to automate their internal processes, but have no programming experts. Through BRYTER, we were able to reduce repetitive tasks significantly, making final results more consistent and our organisation generally more efficient. After a brief introduction, anybody can learn how to quickly build modules and "apps", without knowing anything about coding. And whenever a problem arises, the BRYTER team is ready to catch you and solve it very quickly.

There is not anything I dislike about BRYTER. The only problems that sometimes arise - as with any IT solution - are bugs, but they are always resolved very quickly.

We use BRYTER mainly for administrative and reporting purposes: we have built tools to allow the registration of new clients for example, and for lawyers to update the legal coordinator on their work. As everything flows automatically in our database, it has saved us time and made outcomes more predictable and consistent. Additionally, as we are a vounteer based organisation whose team members often change, BRYTER has allowed us to offer guided pathways to new members, who can feel confident they are following the right procedure.

Structure, design, opportunities for extension

You need to invest some time to get the maximum use

Seeing at first glance in a score card format the degree to which ethical considerations are taken into consideration in the use of artificial intelligence